NO.PZ2016031002000045
问题如下:
What's the reason for effective duration is a more appropriate estimation for interest rate risk than modified duration for a bond with embedded options?
选项:
A.
Because the bond with embedded options exhibits high convexity.
B.
Because the bond with embedded options tends to have greater credit risk than option-free bonds.
C.
Because the option-embedded bond has uncertain cash flows and the cash flows depend on future interest rates.
解释:
C is correct.
The uncertain cash flows of an option-embedded bond, which depend on the path of interest rate changes, is the reason why effective duration must be used.
考点:duration
解析:含权债券只能用effective duration来衡量,是因为含权债券的现金流是不确定的。现金流会受到未来利率变化的影响。比如:利率下降了,callable bond的发行人可能会提前赎回债券,以一个更低的利率重新发行债券进行再融资,从而降低融资成本。一旦债券被提前赎回,那债券的现金流就发生了变化。正因为现金流的不确定性,导致无法用modified duration,只能用站在事后观察到的价格变化来反推effective duration。故选项C正确。
请问A选项哪里错了?不论是买权还是卖权都是因为价格和收益率曲线是凸向原点的曲线,导致价格涨不上去跌不下去的不就是convexity的性质吗?