开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

IanZQ · 2023年05月21日

这个可以作为结论背么

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202209060200004401

问题如下:

Based on Choate’s comments regarding the Credit Opportunities Fund, which strategy approach(es) does Ipswich most likely follow?

选项:

A.Bottom-up. B.Top-down with ESG considerations. C.Top-down and bottom-up.

解释:

Solution

C is correct. Ipswich follows a top-down and bottom-up approach. The top-down approach involves the investor formulating a view on major macroeconomic trends, such as economic growth and corporate default rates, and then selecting the bonds that the investor expects to perform best in a given environment. The bottom-up approach involves selecting the individual bonds or issuers that the investor views as having the best relative value from among a set of bonds or issuers with similar characteristics (usually the same industry and often the same country of domicile).

A is incorrect because Ipswich follows a bottom-up approach but also applies top-down in asset allocation.

B is incorrect because while Ipswich follows a top-down approach, there is no mention of ESG considerations and the description actually states it doesn’t look at business practices.

Relative to high-yield bonds, investment-grade bonds are more sensitive to interest rate changes and credit migration risk;

High-yield bonds are not as sensitive to interest rates。



这个可以作为结论背么~~这个和常理真的有点违背,总感觉HYB对利率变化更敏感。

2 个答案

AM1989 · 2023年07月06日

老师好,原文中,涉及major macroeconomic trends的句子具体是哪一句,有劳帮忙定位下,多谢多谢🙏

pzqa015 · 2023年05月21日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


这个是要当结论记下的

HYB have lower price sensitivity to interest rate changes than IG bond。原理如下:

price sensivity to investment rate change指的是债券价格对基准利率变化的影响程度,或者说基准利率变化1单位,债券价格变化多少。

根据yC=yB+spread,实务中我们观察到spread与yB变化负相关,比如yB下降,表明经济衰退时央行采取扩张的货币政策引导基准利率下降,但衰退时公司经营恶化,公司债风险比变大,所以spread变大,正是由于spread与基准利率的负相关,导致spread对基准利率有抵消作用。

例如:yb下降1%,如果没有spread,yc也会下降1%,但有了spread后,面对yb下降,spread可能会变大0.5%,导致yc下降幅度小于yb下降幅度,这种现象在HYB身上尤为明显,因为经济衰退时,HYB的信用风险更大,spread上涨的更多,所以抵消作用更大,故对于HYB来说,面对yb下降带来的yC下降更少,同时,由于Price是根据yc求出来的,所以yc变化小,那么HYB的price变化就小,也即对基准利率的变化less sensitivity。

yb上涨1%,如果没有spread,yc也会上涨1%,但有了spread后,面对yb上涨,spread可能会下降0.5%,导致yc的上涨幅度小于yb的上涨幅度,这种现象在HYB身上尤为明显,因为经济变好时,HYB的信用风险下降的更多,spread下降的更多,抵消作用更大,故对于HYB来说,面对yb上涨带来的yc上涨更少。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 510

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202209060200004401问题如下Baseon Choate’s comments regarng the Cret Opportunities Fun whistrategy approach(es) es Ipswimost likely follow?A.Bottom-up.B.Top-wn with ESG consirations.C.Top-wn anbottom-up.SolutionC is correct. Ipswifollows a top-wn anbottom-up approach. The top-wn approainvolves the investor formulating a view on major macroeconomic tren, sueconomic growth ancorporate fault rates, anthen selecting the bon ththe investor expects to perform best in a given environment. The bottom-up approainvolves selecting the invibon or issuers ththe investor views having the best relative value from among a set of bon or issuers with similcharacteristi(usually the same instry anoften the same country of micile).A is incorrebecause Ipswifollows a bottom-up approabut also applies top-wn in asset allocation.B is incorrebecause while Ipswifollows a top-wn approach, there is no mention of ESG consirations anthe scription actually states it esn’t look business practices.这道题为什么有top wn

2023-11-26 20:33 2 · 回答

NO.PZ202209060200004401 问题如下 Spencer Hale is a reporter for “Aisor’s Monthly,” a newsletter thfeatures selemutufunmanagers anis circulateto registereinvestment aisers (RIAs). Hale reports on managers who have performewell over a three-yeperio He focuses on their investment style, philosophy, anprocess while highlighting some persontraits to make the reang entertaining. Because the newsletter is ecationfor RIwho are generalists across asset classes, Hale also incorporates some technicmateriin the story. He publishethe following article subsequent to a recent interview:Harlow Choate is the portfolio manager of the Cret Opportunities Fun(COF) IpswiAisors, LLChoate navigates his funwith the same xterity his 46-foot sloop, scouring the markets for attractive cret securities. He scribes his strategy approahaving “objective to bethe Barclays US Investment-Gra Corporate Inx 100 basis points (bps) annually with a tracking error volatility of 200 bps. We evaluate the relative value of securities within countries ansectors using our own assessment of cret-relaterisks anuse expecteexcess return the measure to make relative value cisions. We consir overall corporate profitability, fault rates, aninstry tren to allocate to instry sectors anwhen aing asset class, suhigh-yielbon. Investments are not restrictebaseon companies’ business practices.”Choate elaborates on the fferent risk consirations he attributes to investment-gra bon compareto high-yielbon, “Relative to high-yielbon, investment-gra bon are more sensitive to interest rate changes ancret migration risk, resulting in cret sprevolatility. High-yielbon are not sensitive to interest rates, an given the potentifor actucret losses causefault, monitoring outright market value of the position is more criticwith high-yielbon thwith investment-gra bon.”Choate is nimble with seafaring tools, suthe compass ansextant, so it is no wonr thhe employs a number of specializetools when investing in bon. He shares his favorite measures to assess how muhe is being compensatefor the cret-relaterisks he takes, saying “There are a number of cret spremeasures thcusewhen evaluating risky bon. My preferenis to use a measure the security level thuses a spreover a lineinterpolation of the yiel of two on-the-run government bon. the portfolio level, I prefer to use a measure thapplies to a versifiegroup of securities, whether they have embeeoptions or not.”Similto many fixeincome investors, Choate envisions the glass half empty. He is concerneabout the challenging market environment, liquity, ana number of blaswor tail risks thcoulpotentially impathe performanof his investments. He outlines for Hale the precautions he ctake in the portfolio anspecifically outlines three key consirations:Consiration 1: Liquity risk hincreasemarkey for corporate bon, particularly sinthe globfinancicrisis. We assess liquity through a number of measures, suthe biask sprea trang volumes, anthe impaof fun flows. We manage liquity through position sizes, the use of Treasuries, exchange-trafun, anrivatives.Consiration 2: Tail risk events are challenging to mol or preaheof time. Scenario analysis cprovi incation of how a portfolio woulperform unr certain contions, susprea wining a certain amount across the cret curve. The positions in a portfolio cstressein scenario analysis assuming similoutcomes of a past crisis recur.Consiration 3: It is fficult to hee tail risks through portfolio versification, anit calso prove too costly. We prefer to hee using surivatives cret fault swaps, whihave a very low cost.Choate es not limit his investments strictly to mestic issuers. He prefers to traverse the globwaters for opportunities. His rationale is fairly straightforwar “The cret market is globin nature. We evaluate opportunities across regions ancountries, whiinclu emerging markets. We are especially keen on emerging market crets, whicprovi excess returns thoutperform the mestic anglobvelopemarket inxes. Because the emerging market crets are not incluin the performanbenchmark, we limit the maximum exposure to this asset class anbuy them in either USor the loccurrenpenng on the totexpectereturn of the transaction.”Choate’s fincomments to Hale tail how he also looks for structurefinanciinstruments thoffer versification benefits anattractive expectereturns. These are listein Exhibit 1, whishows recent COF portfolio positioning relative to the benchmark anreflects various opportunities Choate huncovereacross severmarkets.Exhibit 1 COF Portfolio Holngs of 12/31/xxQuestion Baseon Choate’s comments regarng the Cret Opportunities Fun whistrategy approach(es) es Ipswimost likely follow? A.Bottom-up. B.Top-wn with ESG consirations. C.Top-wn anbottom-up. SolutionC is correct. Ipswifollows a top-wn anbottom-up approach. The top-wn approainvolves the investor formulating a view on major macroeconomic tren, sueconomic growth ancorporate fault rates, anthen selecting the bon ththe investor expects to perform best in a given environment. The bottom-up approainvolves selecting the invibon or issuers ththe investor views having the best relative value from among a set of bon or issuers with similcharacteristi(usually the same instry anoften the same country of micile).A is incorrebecause Ipswifollows a bottom-up approabut also applies top-wn in asset allocation.B is incorrebecause while Ipswifollows a top-wn approach, there is no mention of ESG consirations anthe scription actually states it esn’t look business practices. 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

2023-08-06 22:22 1 · 回答