NO.PZ2023041102000041
问题如下：
Tremblay provides two justifications for adding Brazilian stocks rather than Ecuadoran stocks to her portfolio. She believes:
Brazil is sufficiently developed to be considered part of the group of developed nations but Ecuador is not. Investing in countries with lower per capita incomes that are members of the developed nations group should, over long periods of time, provide a higher rate of return than investing in countries with higher per capita income. Brazil is more open than Ecuador is to importing technology from advanced countries.
Tremblay's justifications for preferring Brazilian stocks to Ecuadoran stocks are most consistent with which economic growth model?
选项：
A.Neoclassical B.Endogenous C.Classical解释：
Tremblay's first justification describes "club convergence." Her second justification describes a second source of convergence–imitating or adopting technology already widely used in the advanced countries. Convergence is consistent with the neoclassical growth model.
想问下，题干中似乎没有提及趋同的概念呀？为什么从趋同的知识点来推断是新古典模型呐？
原来我的理解：题干说明了选择B国家投资的原因——B是发达国家中人均收入较低的，所以投资B国会有更高的回报，而且B国家对科技投资的态度更开放，所以联系到内生理论，因为投资引入导致科技树上升，从而达到更高的经济水平，也和选择B国家投资获取更高的投资回报是一致的。不知道为啥理解错
