WilliamSZ · 2023年05月14日
NO.PZ2022072201000011
问题如下：
When might escalation NOT be the right step in an engagement that has made no progress?
选项：
A.When collective engagement is prevented by regulatory standards.
B.When no progress has been made and the objective does not warrant excess activity.
C.When divestment is the likely step should no change be made.
D.Pending a forthcoming shareholder resolution.
解释：
解析：当没有任何进展，并且目标不值得进行过多的活动时，escalation可能就不再是需要的。
既然监管有限制，按照题意，小股东们再一起去esclation也没有意义，不正确也不恰当，符合题干说的not right
NO.PZ2022072201000011问题如下 When might escalation NOT the right step in engagement thhma no progress? A.When collective engagement is preventeregulatory stanr.B.When no progress hbeen ma anthe objective es not warrant excess activity.C.When vestment is the likely step shoulno change ma.Penng a forthcoming shareholr resolution. 解析当没有任何进展，并且目标不值得进行过多的活动时，escalation可能就不再是需要的。 老师能下B的说法和原文的说法差在哪儿吗？因为我理解B就是发现没有进展之后不在做下一步了呀？！
NO.PZ2022072201000011问题如下 When might escalation NOT the right step in engagement thhma no progress? A.When collective engagement is preventeregulatory stanr.B.When no progress hbeen ma anthe objective es not warrant excess activity.C.When vestment is the likely step shoulno change ma.Penng a forthcoming shareholr resolution. 解析当没有任何进展，并且目标不值得进行过多的活动时，escalation可能就不再是需要的。 请问为什么c不对呢？
NO.PZ2022072201000011 问题如下 When might escalation NOT the right step in engagement thhma no progress? A.When collective engagement is preventeregulatory stanr. B.When no progress hbeen ma anthe objective es not warrant excess activity. C.When vestment is the likely step shoulno change ma. Penng a forthcoming shareholr resolution. 解析当没有任何进展，并且目标不值得进行过多的活动时，escalation可能就不再是需要的。 No.PZ2022072201000011 (选择题)来源: 原版书When might escalation NOT the right step in engagement thhma no progress?您的回答正确答案是: BAWhen collective engagement is preventeregulatory stanr.因为法律规范具有强制性，某项活动如果不符合法规的话，肯定是不能开展的，似乎A比B 更有说服力。为什么不能选A？
NO.PZ2022072201000011问题如下 When might escalation NOT the right step in engagement thhma no progress? A.When collective engagement is preventeregulatory stanr.B.When no progress hbeen ma anthe objective es not warrant excess activity.C.When vestment is the likely step shoulno change ma.Penng a forthcoming shareholr resolution. 解析当没有任何进展，并且目标不值得进行过多的活动时，escalation可能就不再是需要的。 B项: 不太理解objective esn't warrant excess activities“当目标不值得过多活动”是什么意思？能不能举个具体例子阐述一下这个情景？ 另外“等待股东决议”为什么是需要升级？
