开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

toffee · 2023年05月04日

这个题能否从影响 balancing corridor width 的 因素分析呢?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201805280100000303

问题如下:

The broker suggests that Young rebalance her $5.5 million money market account and the $3.0 million tax-deferred retirement account periodically in order to maintain their targeted allocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for the equity positions with two potential target equity allocations and rebalancing ranges for the two accounts as follows:
■ Alternative 1: 80% equities +/– 8.0% rebalancing range
■ Alternative 2: 75% equities +/– 10.7% rebalancing range

选项:

解释:

for $5.5 million money market account,there must be taxed ,so the rebalancing range is wider . the alternative 2 fits 5.5m account.

for $3.0 million tax-deferred retirement account, there has favorable tax. so the rebalancing range is narrow. alternative 1 fits 3.3m account.

对于税收账户,wider点

对于tax efficient 来说 , narrow点 ?上面的答题的角度可以不?

1 个答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2023年05月05日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


对于税收账户,wider点

对于tax efficient 来说 , narrow点 ?上面的答题的角度可以不?


是的,就是这个角度。


首先,5.5m的账户实际上就是普通的税收账户,3m的递延退休账户是税收优惠账户。


关于Rebalance range这一知识点我们主要掌握老师讲到的几点,我这里有一个总结的方法,所有的因素都可以归总到两个方面,第一需要不需要,第二能不能(一般是看成本)。


比如波动率越大,range越窄。因为波动性比较高,说明资产的风险比较大,所以需要做频繁调整,那么就要设定一个比较窄的调整区间。


再比如税收越高,range越宽。税收高成本就高,越不能频繁调整,那么就要设定一个比较宽的调整区间。


所有的因素都可以代入这两个方面来进行分析,掌握原理就很好记忆了。


这道题波动率和税收两个角度都可以,税收要直接一点。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 394

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201805280100000303 问题如下 The broker suggests thYoung rebalanher $5.5 million money market account anthe $3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account periocally in orr to maintain their targeteallocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for the equity positions with two potentitarget equity allocations anrebalancing ranges for the two accounts follows:■ Alternative 1: 80% equities +/– 8.0% rebalancing range■ Alternative 2: 75% equities +/– 10.7% rebalancing range 税后波动小于税前波动,波动小,不太波动的情况下,交易成本就小,那为什么wir?而不是narrow?

2024-09-24 11:53 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000303 问题如下 The broker suggests thYoung rebalanher $5.5 million money market account anthe $3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account periocally in orr to maintain their targeteallocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for the equity positions with two potentitarget equity allocations anrebalancing ranges for the two accounts follows:■ Alternative 1: 80% equities +/– 8.0% rebalancing range■ Alternative 2: 75% equities +/– 10.7% rebalancing range 就是看了题目和答案解析没懂,老师能不能用中文讲一遍?

2024-09-14 15:14 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000303 问题如下 The broker suggests thYoung rebalanher $5.5 million money market account anthe $3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account periocally in orr to maintain their targeteallocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for the equity positions with two potentitarget equity allocations anrebalancing ranges for the two accounts follows:■ Alternative 1: 80% equities +/– 8.0% rebalancing range■ Alternative 2: 75% equities +/– 10.7% rebalancing range 本题直接从taxable账户要选 wir 节约成本的角度就可以了吧?为什么要绕道volaitility去呢?虽然结果是一样的,但是想不到答案里的从波动性再推到range的角度。

2024-07-02 00:44 1 · 回答

解析错误 没看懂为什么这道题是5,5m的账户对应选择2,老师求解析?

2024-06-03 15:34 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000303问题如下 The broker suggests thYoung rebalanher $5.5 million money market account anthe $3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account periocally in orr to maintain their targeteallocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for the equity positions with two potentitarget equity allocations anrebalancing ranges for the two accounts follows:■ Alternative 1: 80% equities +/– 8.0% rebalancing range■ Alternative 2: 75% equities +/– 10.7% rebalancing range 如果这题我回答的角度是 money market account is a taxable account, tbrings aitioncost for rebalance, so neewir rebalanrange 对吗?

2023-09-06 19:36 1 · 回答