开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

TZXคิดถึง · 2023年05月01日

可以详细解答一下这道题吗?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202304050200003207

问题如下:

Determine, using the significant variable(s) in Logistic Regression 2 and the information provided, which of the following is closest to the probability of the Alpha ETF being a winning fund and whether it would be classified as a winning fund.

Alpha ETF variable values: small_fund = 0, medium_fund = 0, portfolio_stocks= 99.3%, portfolio_bonds = 0.7%, price_earnings = 25.0, price_book =1.1, price_sales = 4.0, and price_cashflow = 5.7.

Use significance level of 5% and probability threshold for being a winner of 65%.

选项:

A.

27.4%, and the Alpha ETF is not classified as a winning fund

B.

36.0%, and the Alpha ETF is not classified as a winning fund

C.

82.2%, and the Alpha ETF is classified as a winning fund

解释:

B is correct. Besides the significant intercept, the only significant (at 5% level) variable in Logistic Regression 2 is price_sales. Using these factors, the probability of this ETF being a winning fund is calculated to be 35.95%, as follows:

Probability of being a winning fund = 0.3595 =

Because this probability is well below the 65% threshold for being a winner, the Alpha EFT would not be classified as a winning fund.

最后一问的计算没看懂,怎么计算出来35.95?解析给的答案又是什么意思?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

星星_品职助教 · 2023年05月02日

同学你好,

1)题干要求“using the significant variable”,所以根据p-value小于significance level 0.05,在logistic regression 2中只能代入significant的price_sale(和intercept)。计算出此时log odds=Ln p/(1-p)=-1.9585+0.3453×4.0=-0.5773.

据此解出p=0.3595 (细微差异来自四舍五入)

2)根据题干给出的probability threshold for being a winner of 65%,由于p=35.95%<65%,所以将该fund归类为not winning。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 777

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202304050200003207问题如下 termine, using the significant variable(s) in Logistic Regression 2anthe information provi whiof the following is closest to theprobability of the Alpha ETF being a winning funanwhether it woulbeclassifiea winning funAlpha ETF variable values: small_fun= 0, meum_fun= 0, portfolio_stocks=99.3%, portfolio_bon = 0.7%, price_earnings = 25.0, price_book =1.1,price_sales = 4.0, anprice_cashflow = 5.7.Use significanlevel of5% anprobability thresholfor being a winner of 65%. A.27.4%, anthe Alpha ETF is not classifieawinning fun.36.0%, anthe Alpha ETF is not classifieawinning fun.82.2%, anthe Alpha ETF is classifiea winningfun B is correct. Besis the significant intercept, theonly significant (5% level) variable in Logistic Regression 2 isprice_sales. Using these factors, the probability of this ETF being a winningfunis calculateto 35.95%, follows:Probability ofbeing a winning fun= 0.3595 =Because this probability is well below the 65%thresholfor being a winner, the Alpha EFT woulnot classifieawinning fun 老师好,我看到这边求P的公式是P=1/{1+exp[-(b0+b1x1+b2x2+…..]}因此代入本题,怎么都得不出答案,我的计算是这样的P=1/{1+exp[-(-1.9589+0.3543*4.0)]}而答案给的公式是P=1/{1+exp[-(-1.9589)+0.3543*4.0]}总感觉答案个公式这个开头的负号和求P的公式不对呢,负号应该是在最外面的。请问老师我是哪个知识点没掌握,麻烦帮忙做个辨析对比,什么时候用什么,谢谢!

2024-10-01 14:50 1 · 回答