开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

kukuku026 · 2023年03月26日

没有看懂这个道题

老师这道题,我没有读懂, 看了别的解释也没懂, 麻烦老师讲解一下。 谢谢老师。


No.PZ2019012201000068 (选择题)

来源: 品职出题

Hans Smith, an Albright portfolio manager, makes the following notes after examining these funds:

Note 2 The DoGood Fund invests in Fleeker Corporation stock, which is rated high in the ESG space, and Fleeker’s pension fund has a significant investment in the DoGood Fund. This dynamic has the potential for a conflict of interest on the part of Fleeker Corporation but not for the DoGood Fund.

Note 3 The DoGood Fund’s portfolio manager has written policies stating that the fund does not engage in shareholder activism. Therefore, the DoGood Fund may be a free-rider on the activism by these shareholders.

Which of the following notes about the DoGood Fund is correct?

A

Only Note 2

B

Only Note 3

C

Both Note 2 and Note 3

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2023年03月28日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


老师这道题,我没有读懂, 看了别的解释也没懂, 麻烦老师讲解一下。 谢谢老师。


Hello,亲爱的同学!


老师解释一下这道题:


Note2是不正确的。错在but not for the DoGood Fund. 无论是 Fleeker Corporation对 DoGood Fund,还是 DoGood Fund对 Fleeker Corporation,都有利益冲突。这个利益冲突是双向的。


Note3正确。free-rider 是指当一个股东行使activist行为时,就会促使公司治理结构改善,那么即使其他股东没有出力,也会受益。这正是free rider的定义。


不知道同学是否理解,同学如果还有不理解的,也可以对具体不理解的地方进行指出,这样老师可以更有针对性的来解答。





----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 289

    浏览
相关问题