开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

皓月 · 2022年11月14日

A为什么不对?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202208160100000602

问题如下:

The chance of punitive regulatory action after the investigation of the steel industry merger is:

选项:

A.likely due to the economic impact of the layoffs. B.likely due to exclusive dealing with some customers. C.unlikely due to price declines that benefit most customers.

解释:

Solution

B is correct. The special exclusive nature of the contracts is an anticompetitive arrangement and may attract punitive regulatory action. The layoffs are not evidence of anticompetitive behavior. Price declines might be evidence of predatory pricing.

A is incorrect. The layoffs are not evidence of anticompetitive behavior and therefore not likely to attract punitive regulatory action.

C is incorrect. Price declines might be evidence of predatory pricing, which is an anticompetitive practice and may attract punitive regulatory action.

我知道B是对的,但是大规模失业不足以形成证据吗?

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2022年11月14日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


我知道B是对的,但是大规模失业不足以形成证据吗?


Hello,亲爱的同学!

并不是哦。

我们这里说的是反竞争行为监管,也就是防止一家公司做得太大,对整个行业形成碾压性优势而形成垄断。


裁员并不是反竞争行为的证据,因此不太可能招致惩罚性的监管行动。

大规模失业,并不是造成垄断的原因。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 499

    浏览
相关问题