开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

zhouyu · 2022年11月09日

这种算法不对吗?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202208300100000201

问题如下:

The most appropriate value (in millions) for Suburban’s investment in West Reach at December 31, 2016, is:

选项:

A.$12.00. B.$13.68. C.$14.88.

解释:

Solution

C is correct. Although Suburban’s ownership interest (24%) in West Reach exceeds the amount that is normally deemed sufficient to presume significant influence (20%), the inability to elect directors or influence the firm’s policy making indicates a lack of significant influence. It would thus be inappropriate to account for its holdings under the equity method. Instead West Reach should be considered a passive investment of Suburban and carried at full value. Although difficult to value because of its private status, the recent sale by Mr. French provides an observable price that can be used to revalue Suburban’s holdings per the table below.

A is incorrect. This is the cost value of the investment.

B is incorrect. This would be the value if West Reach was considered an equity investment, per the following table:

这种算法不对吗?


2 个答案

袁园_品职助教 · 2022年12月06日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


这个题目没有告诉我们,我们不需要探究。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

袁园_品职助教 · 2022年11月09日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


这是C选项的算法,但是这道题,不能用equity method做,因为虽然超过20%的股权,但是没有significant influence.原因是下面题干中的红框部分,不能入董事会也影响不了分红政策,所以这个投资就是一个passive investment.我们可以直接用fair value来算。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

𝒜𝒩𝒥𝒜 安雅🎃 · 2022年12月06日

【这个投资就是一个passive investment.我们可以直接用fair value来算。】--那这种被动投资是属于FVOCI还是FVPL?这个不需要深究吧?