开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Sophie · 2022年10月08日

题是算出来的, 算出的数字也一样,但是还是没明白。 第二年 Dep为48,000,第四年Dep为24,000,问题是问第四年的Dep 跟第二年Dep比怎么样?不是应该选第四年的dep比第二年的dep小吗?为什么选大?请老师解下疑,谢谢!

NO.PZ2017102901000054

问题如下:

A company purchases equipment for $200,000 with a five-year useful life and salvage value of zero. It uses the double-declining balance method of depreciation for two years, then shifts to straight-line depreciation at the beginning of Year 3. Compared with annual depreciation expense under the double-declining balance method, the resulting annual depreciation expense in Year 4 is:

选项:

A.

smaller.

B.

the same.

C.

greater.

解释:

C is correct.

Shifting at the end of Year 2 from double-declining balance to straight-line depreciation methodology results in depreciation expense being the same in each of Years 3, 4, and 5. Shifting to the straight-line methodology at the beginning of Year 3 results in a greater depreciation expense in Year 4 than would have been calculated using the double-declining balance method.

Depreciation expense Year 4 (Using double-declining balance method all five years)

= 2 × Annual depreciation % using straight-line method × Carrying amount at end of Year 3

= 40% × $43,200

Depreciation expense Year 4 with switch to straight-line method in Year 3

= 1/3 × Remaining depreciable cost at start of Year 3

= 1/3× $72,000

= $24,000

问题如下:

A company purchases equipment for $200,000 with a five-year useful life and salvage value of zero. It uses the double-declining balance method of depreciation for two years, then shifts to straight-line depreciation at the beginning of Year 3. Compared with annual depreciation expense under the double-declining balance method, the resulting annual depreciation expense in Year 4 is:

选项:

A.

smaller.

B.

the same.

C.

greater.

解释:

C is correct.

Shifting at the end of Year 2 from double-declining balance to straight-line depreciation methodology results in depreciation expense being the same in each of Years 3, 4, and 5. Shifting to the straight-line methodology at the beginning of Year 3 results in a greater depreciation expense in Year 4 than would have been calculated using the double-declining balance method.

Depreciation expense Year 4 (Using double-declining balance method all five years)

= 2 × Annual depreciation % using straight-line method × Carrying amount at end of Year 3

= 40% × $43,200

Depreciation expense Year 4 with switch to straight-line method in Year 3

= 1/3 × Remaining depreciable cost at start of Year 3

= 1/3× $72,000

= $24,000

5年加速折旧法: 20w*2/5=8w (20-8)*2/5=6.4w

添加评论

  •  0 0
1 个答案

纠纠_品职答疑助手 · 大约 1 年前

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


这个是用双倍余额递减法之后到第四年年初(第三年年末)固定资产的价值。

因为这里原价是 200,000。

第一年的折旧 = 200,000 * 2/5 = 80,000. 所以第一年剩余金额为 120,000

第二年的折旧= 120,000 * 2/5= 48,000.所以第二年剩余金额为 72,000。

第三年的折旧 = 72,000*2/5=28,800,.所以第三年年剩余金额为 43,200。

1 个答案

Kiko_品职助教 · 2022年10月09日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


这一题问的是,如果第三年的折旧方法从DDB 变成 直线折旧,那么在第四年里, 相比继续用DDB的方法,用直线折旧法的折旧金额是大还是小。跟第二年没有关系。比较的是第四年,两种方法的折旧费用大小。


----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 383

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2017102901000054问题如下A company purchases equipment for $200,000 with a five-yeuseful life ansalvage value of zero. It uses the uble-clining balanmethoof preciation for two years, then shifts to straight-line preciation the beginning of Ye3. Comparewith annupreciation expense unr the uble-clining balanmetho the resulting annupreciation expense in Ye4 is:A.smaller.B.the same.C.greater.C is correct. Shifting the enof Ye2 from uble-clining balanto straight-line preciation methology results in preciation expense being the same in eaof Years 3, 4, an5. Shifting to the straight-line methology the beginning of Ye3 results in a greater preciation expense in Ye4 thwoulhave been calculateusing the uble-clining balanmethopreciation expense Ye4 (Using uble-clining balanmethoall five years)= 2 × Annupreciation % using straight-line metho× Carrying amount enof Ye3= 40% × $43,200preciation expense Ye4 with switto straight-line methoin Ye3= 1/3 × Remaining preciable cost start of Ye3= 1/3× $72,000= $24,000更大。。。。。。。。

2023-07-11 08:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2017102901000054 问题如下 A company purchases equipment for $200,000 with a five-yeuseful life ansalvage value of zero. It uses the uble-clining balanmethoof preciation for two years, then shifts to straight-line preciation the beginning of Ye3. Comparewith annupreciation expense unr the uble-clining balanmetho the resulting annupreciation expense in Ye4 is: A.smaller. B.the same. C.greater. C is correct. Shifting the enof Ye2 from uble-clining balanto straight-line preciation methology results in preciation expense being the same in eaof Years 3, 4, an5. Shifting to the straight-line methology the beginning of Ye3 results in a greater preciation expense in Ye4 thwoulhave been calculateusing the uble-clining balanmethopreciation expense Ye4 (Using uble-clining balanmethoall five years)= 2 × Annupreciation % using straight-line metho× Carrying amount enof Ye3= 40% × $43,200preciation expense Ye4 with switto straight-line methoin Ye3= 1/3 × Remaining preciable cost start of Ye3= 1/3× $72,000= $24,000 这一题问的是什么意思

2023-02-03 07:27 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2017102901000054问题如下A company purchases equipment for $200,000 with a five-yeuseful life ansalvage value of zero. It uses the uble-clining balanmethoof preciation for two years, then shifts to straight-line preciation the beginning of Ye3. Comparewith annupreciation expense unr the uble-clining balanmetho the resulting annupreciation expense in Ye4 is:A.smaller.B.the same.C.greater.C is correct. Shifting the enof Ye2 from uble-clining balanto straight-line preciation methology results in preciation expense being the same in eaof Years 3, 4, an5. Shifting to the straight-line methology the beginning of Ye3 results in a greater preciation expense in Ye4 thwoulhave been calculateusing the uble-clining balanmethopreciation expense Ye4 (Using uble-clining balanmethoall five years)= 2 × Annupreciation % using straight-line metho× Carrying amount enof Ye3= 40% × $43,200preciation expense Ye4 with switto straight-line methoin Ye3= 1/3 × Remaining preciable cost start of Ye3= 1/3× $72,000= $24,000老师,我理解的这道题目是这间公司前两年是使用B折旧,第三年开始转换到直线法,然后比较第四年在两种折旧方法下的折旧费用。那么按照我的理解就应该是前两年按照B计算,第三年按照直线法。算出来第三年的数之后,第四年用两种方法分别计算比大小?这才是题目翻译过来的要求,可看答案也对不上。

2023-01-09 03:00 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2017102901000054问题如下 A company purchases equipment for $200,000 with a five-yeuseful life ansalvage value of zero. It uses the uble-clining balanmethoof preciation for two years, then shifts to straight-line preciation the beginning of Ye3. Comparewith annupreciation expense unr the uble-clining balanmetho the resulting annupreciation expense in Ye4 is:A.smaller.B.the same.C.greater.C is correct. Shifting the enof Ye2 from uble-clining balanto straight-line preciation methology results in preciation expense being the same in eaof Years 3, 4, an5. Shifting to the straight-line methology the beginning of Ye3 results in a greater preciation expense in Ye4 thwoulhave been calculateusing the uble-clining balanmethopreciation expense Ye4 (Using uble-clining balanmethoall five years)= 2 × Annupreciation % using straight-line metho× Carrying amount enof Ye3= 40% × $43,200preciation expense Ye4 with switto straight-line methoin Ye3= 1/3 × Remaining preciable cost start of Ye3= 1/3× $72,000= $24,000外国人都这么表达吗?最后一句问题,前面有个annupreciation expense后面又问的annupreciation expense,这个很模糊啊,到底英文是个什么逻辑,求指导

2022-10-07 21:33 1 · 回答