开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Captain America · 2022年09月11日

请解释一下这道题,谢谢

NO.PZ2019120301000253

问题如下:

Question A company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS incurred and capitalized €2 million of development costs during the year. These costs were fully deductible immediately for tax purposes, but the company is depreciating them over two years for financial reporting purposes. The company has a long history of profitability, which is expected to continue. Which is the most appropriate way for an analyst to incorporate the differential tax treatment in his analysis? He should include it in:

选项:

A.equity when calculating the company’s return-on-equity ratio.

B.liabilities when calculating the company’s debt-to-equity ratio.

C.liabilities when calculating the company’s current ratio.

解释:

Solution

B is correct. The different treatment for tax purposes and financial reporting purposes is a temporary difference and would create a deferred tax liability. Deferred tax liabilities should be classified as debt if they are expected to reverse with subsequent tax payments. The long history of profitability implies the company will likely be paying taxes in the following years, and hence an analyst could reasonably expect the temporary difference to reverse. Under IFRS, all deferred tax liabilities are non-current.

A is incorrect. It would be included in equity only if there were no expectation of subsequent tax payment, which is not likely given the history of profitability.

C is incorrect. Under IFRS, all deferred tax liabilities are non-current, so it would not be included in the current ratio even though it is expected to reverse next year.

请解释一下这道题,谢谢

1 个答案
已采纳答案

Kiko_品职助教 · 2022年09月13日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


这道题是判断差别税收应该计入什么。

首先不可能是A,因为题目说了“The company has a long history of profitability, which is expected to continue. ”,公司有长期营收历史,所以公司会在接下来的几年里面交税,所以预期暂时差异会逆转。

其次,题目说资本化了研发成本,但这笔费用在税法上是一次性作为expense抵税的,所以税法上我们前期交的税就少,后期才会慢慢还,所以形成的是DTL。DTL是非流动性负债,所以不会涉及到流动比率,所以答案C不对。会影响到debt to equity ratio的,答案是B


----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 507

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019120301000253 问题如下 QuestionA company thprepares its financistatements in accornwith IFRS incurreancapitalize€2 million of velopment costs ring the year. These costs were fully ctible immeately for tpurposes, but the company is preciating them over two years for financireporting purposes. The company ha long history of profitability, whiis expecteto continue. Whiis the most appropriate wfor analyst to incorporate the fferentittreatment in his analysis? He shoulinclu it in: A.equity when calculating the company’s return-on-equity ratio. B.liabilities when calculating the company’s bt-to-equity ratio. C.liabilities when calculating the company’s current ratio. SolutionB is correct. The fferent treatment for tpurposes anfinancireporting purposes is a temporary fferenanwoulcreate a ferretliability. ferretliabilities shoulclassifieif they are expecteto reverse with subsequent tpayments. The long history of profitability implies the company will likely paying taxes in the following years, anhenanalyst coulreasonably expethe temporary fferento reverse. Unr IFRS, all ferretliabilities are non-current.A is incorrect. It woulincluin equity only if there were no expectation of subsequent tpayment, whiis not likely given the history of profitability.C is incorrect. Unr IFRS, all ferretliabilities are non-current, so it woulnot incluin the current ratio even though it is expecteto reverse next year. 请问老师如果题干给出“公司在未来几年不断投入开发”的条件,是不是就能理解为L在可预见的几年不太可能回转,而视为Equity?

2023-05-02 09:00 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019120301000253 问题如下 QuestionA company thprepares its financistatements in accornwith IFRS incurreancapitalize€2 million of velopment costs ring the year. These costs were fully ctible immeately for tpurposes, but the company is preciating them over two years for financireporting purposes. The company ha long history of profitability, whiis expecteto continue. Whiis the most appropriate wfor analyst to incorporate the fferentittreatment in his analysis? He shoulinclu it in: A.equity when calculating the company’s return-on-equity ratio. B.liabilities when calculating the company’s bt-to-equity ratio. C.liabilities when calculating the company’s current ratio. SolutionB is correct. The fferent treatment for tpurposes anfinancireporting purposes is a temporary fferenanwoulcreate a ferretliability. ferretliabilities shoulclassifieif they are expecteto reverse with subsequent tpayments. The long history of profitability implies the company will likely paying taxes in the following years, anhenanalyst coulreasonably expethe temporary fferento reverse. Unr IFRS, all ferretliabilities are non-current.A is incorrect. It woulincluin equity only if there were no expectation of subsequent tpayment, whiis not likely given the history of profitability.C is incorrect. Unr IFRS, all ferretliabilities are non-current, so it woulnot incluin the current ratio even though it is expecteto reverse next year. 完全看不懂

2022-09-11 16:58 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019120301000253 问题如下 QuestionA company thprepares its financistatements in accornwith IFRS incurreancapitalize€2 million of velopment costs ring the year. These costs were fully ctible immeately for tpurposes, but the company is preciating them over two years for financireporting purposes. The company ha long history of profitability, whiis expecteto continue. Whiis the most appropriate wfor analyst to incorporate the fferentittreatment in his analysis? He shoulinclu it in: A.equity when calculating the company’s return-on-equity ratio. B.liabilities when calculating the company’s bt-to-equity ratio. C.liabilities when calculating the company’s current ratio. SolutionB is correct. The fferent treatment for tpurposes anfinancireporting purposes is a temporary fferenanwoulcreate a ferretliability. ferretliabilities shoulclassifieif they are expecteto reverse with subsequent tpayments. The long history of profitability implies the company will likely paying taxes in the following years, anhenanalyst coulreasonably expethe temporary fferento reverse. Unr IFRS, all ferretliabilities are non-current.A is incorrect. It woulincluin equity only if there were no expectation of subsequent tpayment, whiis not likely given the history of profitability.C is incorrect. Unr IFRS, all ferretliabilities are non-current, so it woulnot incluin the current ratio even though it is expecteto reverse next year. 我是没有看懂题干吗?A company thprepares its financistatements in accornwith IFRS incurreancapitalize€2 million of velopment costs ring the year. These costs were fully ctible immeately for tpurposes, but the company is preciating them over two years for financireporting purposes. The company ha long history of profitability, whiis expecteto continue. Whiis the most appropriate wfor analyst to incorporate the fferentittreatment in his analysis? He shoulinclu it inA公司资本化了一个2M的研发成本;如果计入成本的化,税回直接减掉;但是这个公司选择2年摊销为了财务报表更好看。直接计入成本的税和资本化的税有什么不同?

2022-09-11 16:40 1 · 回答