开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

一只可爱的猪 · 2022年08月27日

ethics的一道case,没明白其含义

Omega Financial, a large financial services firm, makes a market in more than 500 stocks. As a market maker, the firm executes institutional orders as well as retail orders placed by its private wealth unit, its broker/dealer affiliate, and other third-party broker/dealers.

A page in Omega’s compliance manual, which adhere to all legal and regulatory requirements, includes the following information:


Consistent with regulatory requirements, Omega discloses the information about riskless principal transactions to all clients and third-party broker/dealers. In addition, Omega informs third-party broker/dealers that it will seek best execution on retail orders.

Omega is developing an automated order-handling system to improve efficiencies in order flow. Anticipated benefits of the new system include much faster execution speeds. Additionally, the system design includes a trading mechanism that will execute portions of certain large orders to reduce market impact. ‑e trading mechanism delays some orders to allow the firm to obtain a better overall price.

Xavier Brown, CFA, is responsible for overseeing the project to ensure its timely completion. Brown enlists the compliance department to review the programming during the initial development phase and identify any potential problems. ‑e compliance department compares the order-handling function of the new system to the third-party software currently in use. ‑ey identify several potential problems, including delays in execution of certain large market orders and embedded markups and markdowns on stocks in which the firm makes a market. According to the compliance department, changes are necessary to comply with regulatory requirements.

Brown directs the programmers to correct the problems and run tests and simulations. ‑e programmers spend the next few months making changes to the system and adding comments throughout the code that clearly explain the purpose of particular functions. After several months, the programmers report that they have corrected all the identified problems and run the necessary tests and simulations. ‑e following month, the firm switches to the automated order-handling system as planned.

Joy Chen, CFA, trades Xydeo stock for Omega. One month following the switch to the new order-handling system, Chen is able to execute a number of principal riskless transactions for both institutional and retail clients at $25.00 per share. When processing the customer buy orders totaling 500,000 shares, the new system automatically uses the best-publicized price of $25.01, and then the firm issues client confirmations showing a purchase price of $25.01.

Stephen Smith, CFA, works across from Chen on the trading desk at Omega. His seat is close to a speaker for the company’s squawk box, which is used to broadcast information about current analyst recommendations, news about market events, and information about pending block trades.

Smith’s young brother-in-law, Adolfo Garcia, recently accepted a position as a broker at a third-party broker/dealer that trades with Omega. Garcia has a modest income and little savings. He is enthusiastic about investments and has enrolled as a CFA candidate. Smith calls Garcia early each morning to talk about the previous day’s events. At the end of their conversation, Smith places the call on speakerphone and resumes his work.

In his office, Garcia can hear Omega’s squawk box over the speakerphone. Garcia enjoys listening as Omega analysts discuss changes in ratings, economic forecasts, and capital market developments. He is careful not to trade in stocks mentioned explicitly on the squawk box. Rather, he sometimes researches competitors and other firms operating in the same industry. In one case, he immediately shorts the stock of Tefla Corporation after an Omega analyst downgrades a firm in the same industry.

Garcia frequently places large block orders for low-priced, small-capitalization stocks at the market price. Once the new system is operational, Smith processes the orders through the new trading system mechanism, which delays execution of portions of the orders and allows the firm to obtain a better price for Garcia.


(1)For a CFA charterholder, would adhering to Omega’s policies regarding riskless principal transactions result in a violation of the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?

A No

B Yes, because Omega disadvantages institutional clients

C Yes, because disclosure of the policy does not relieve Omega of its obligation to treat clients equally

答案:A

这里为什么没有违反?

(2) When overseeing the development of the automated trading system, does Brown violate any of the CFA Institute Standards?

A No

B Yes, because he accepted an assignment for which he was inadequately trained and skilled

C Yes, because he did not ensure that the final system complied with regulatory requirements

答案:C

这里的做法错在哪里了?为什么说最后没有符合规定?题目中哪里体现?哪个知识点?

(3) With regard to Chen’s trades in Xydeo, do the institutional and retail trades both comply with the CFA Institute Standards?

A Only the retail trades comply.

B Only the institutional trades comply.

C Neither the retail nor the institutional trades comply.

答案:B

这里为什么选B?

(4) When placing the morning phone call on speakerphone, does Smith violate any of the CFA Institute Standards?

A No

B Yes, his duty to Omega

C Yes, his duty to clients and to Omega

答案:C

(5) When listening to the Omega squawk box, does Garcia violate any of the CFA Institute Standards?

A No 

B Yes, the standard regarding professionalism 

C Yes, the standard regarding material nonpublic information 

答案:B

为什么这里没有选C

(6)When shorting Tefla stock, does Garcia violate any of the CFA Institute Standards?

A No

B Yes, because he does not have a reasonable basis for the trade

C Yes, because he is in possession of material nonpublic information

答案:C

为什么这里没有选B

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2022年08月28日

1、这里说的是这家公司的“Riskless principal transaction”对机构客户和个人客户有different treatment

  • 机构客户的riskless principal may be traded on a net basis; 但是个人客户(retail orders)的riskless principal transactions may not be traded on net basis,这里虽然感觉是对待机构客户和个人客户不同。但是在retail orders这个格子中后面又提到:对于个人客户是没有mark-up, mark-down(即在给个人客户交易的时候,不会有任何价差),且没有 commissions or fees,所以这里虽然区别对待了机构和个人客户,但1. 交易价格没有价差,2. 因为公司为个人客户和机构客户提供了【不同的服务且收费不同】,且很明显这里机构客户付了钱。
  • 所以,只要在不损害客户利益的情况下,公司是可以区别对待大小客户的。

所以,最终我们分析得出没有违反。


  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 1069

    浏览
相关问题