开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

克里斯汀 · 2022年08月26日

为什么计算不考虑rf

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201512300100001503

问题如下:

Using Approach 3, LED Light’s estimated required rate of return is closest to:

选项:

A.

8.5%

B.

10.5%

C.

12.8%

解释:

B is correct. The required return for LED Light using Approach 3 (bond yield plus risk premium approach) is calculated as follows:

Required rate of return = Expected long-term yield + Equity risk premium

Required rate of return = 0.04 + 0.065 = 0.105 = 10.5%

A is incorrect because the risk-free rate is added to the equity risk premium.

The premium should be relative to the company’s long-term debt, not the risk free rate.

Required rate of return on share i = 0.02 + 0.065 = 0.085 = 8.5%

C is incorrect because the beta has been incorrectly multiplied by the equity risk premium before being added to LED Light’s long-term bond yield:

Required rate of return on share i = 0.04 + (1.35 × 0.065) = 0.12775 ≈ 12.8%

Build up method不应该 Required return = rf + equity risk premium + debt premium = 2%+4%+6.5% = 12.5% ??

这样思考哪里错了

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2022年08月26日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


同学你好,请注意审题哦~~

题干明确说了怎么计算Re哦,以下是题干原文:

“Approach 3 A build-up method using an estimated risk premium of 6.5% that compensates for the additional risk of the equity issue compared with LED Light’s long-term debt.

题干有要求的时候,一定要按题干要求的方式解题哦~~

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!