NO.PZ201604030300004103
问题如下:
3. With regard to the IPO share allocation, are both NGM’s method of trade correction on 15 May and Locke’s demand for a short-term interest credit, respectively, consistent with the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?
选项:
A.Yes.
B.No, only the method of trade correction is consistent.
C.No, only the demand for a short-term interest credit is consistent.
解释:
C is correct.
Locke’s interest claim is legitimate since the Fund’s cash was employed to purchase equities that were later removed from the account. Therefore, the Fund is owed interest for the period in question.
老师,这两段话都没看明白啥意思,可以解释下吗?
- 是说fund收到了50,000股,多收了,但是自己就把多收的卖出了?
【Locke: "The Fund’s portfolio received 50,000 shares of an initial public offering (IPO) on 1 April. On 15 May, 30,000 shares were removed at the current market price."
Black: "There was a problem with NGM’s IPO allocation algorithm. Initially, you were over-allocated and when we discovered the error, your account was adjusted."】
- 这句话啥意思?
【Locke: "Short-term interest should have been credited to the Fund for use of its cash to cover the trade. In any case, this was an IPO of a large international high-tech company. It was not an appropriate investment for the portfolio."】