开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

wzbb · 2022年07月08日

发布到网上的那句话为什么违反规定了?

NO.PZ2018062009000038

问题如下:

After attending the CFA Level I exam, Chen discussed the exam's questions with other candidates that he felt confused about EPS analysis and then found the answer from the reading book when he went back home. He posted statement on the Facebook that, I make a mistake in the exam about EPS calculation and I hope I can pass the Level I. Chen most likely:

选项:

A.

did not violate the Code and Standards by discussing the questions with other candidates.

B.

did not violate the Code and Standards by posting statement on the Facebook.

C.

violated the Code and Standards by posting the exam information on the Facebook.

解释:

C is correct.

After exam, Chen should not discuss any information about exam with other candidates, and Chen also should not post statement about EPS calculation on the Facebook. But “I hope I can pass the level I" is not a violation of the Code and Standards. Conducts of Members and Candidates in the CFA Program prohibits providing exam informations for the candidates or the public.

考完试后,Chen不可以和其他考生讨论关于考试内容的信息,也不应该在Facebook上发关于EPS计算的状态。但是“我希望我可以通过一级考试”这句话并没有违反准则的规定。CFA考生被禁止提供关于考试内容的信息给其他考生或者给大众。

讨论答案违反了,但是,发布到网上的那句话为什么违反了?他只是说自己在eps部分犯了错,可能通不过。这样也算泄漏考试信息?是不能提eps么?

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2022年07月09日

是的, EPS算具体的考点了, 不可以提到具体的考点。